Can a capital of eu represented as an architectural space? Soft capital vs. hard capital?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSağdıç, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorErenoğlu, Tülay
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-13T20:18:42Z
dc.date.available2024-06-13T20:18:42Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentİstanbul Gedik Üniversitesi
dc.descriptionInternational Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts (SGEM 2014) -- 01-10 September, 2014 -- Albena, Bulgaria
dc.description.abstractIn the 21st century EU is one of the super-power of the World while the definition of the union has been produced since the Middle Ages, more than this it is known that the definition of Europe has been produced since the Antique regarding to the economic, sociological, cultural and politic conditions. Although the idea of the united Europe had existed since the Middle Ages, till the 19th century, it is known that the idea could not turned into the reality. Unless after the 19th century and the early 20th century, the ideal construction of the united Europe had found a place in economic and sociological senses and in the build environment, as well. In the mid-20th century, after the two World wars, which affected Europe both physically and sociologically, the idea of Europe was finally institutionalized. The cities are the meeting points of policies and the citizens and the architecture is the tangible reflections of the ideologies and the organizations, due to these characteristics they become the biggest domain of the European Union. Architecture also has been used, as an important tool to achieve legitimacy and it is a proof of the existence of the governments during the pre-modern and modern eras. Chronologically, since 1980's it is known that under the effects of the new form of capitalism, parallel to the Keynesian theories and in 2010's under the effects of Crounch's non-death of capitalism as in the identity of neo-liberal economies, searching of the theme is born on the praxis of the architecture. Thus, the aim of the paper will be analyzing of the capitals of European Union in both the architectural and urban aspects, with respect to the problematic of representation and the concepts of Umberto Eco's Soft Capital vs. Rem Koolhaas's Hard Capital.
dc.description.sponsorshipBulgarian Acad Sci ; Acad Sci Czech Republ ; Latvian Acad Sci ; Polish Acad Sci ; Russian Acad Sci ; Serbian Acad Sci & Arts ; Slovak Acad Sci Intro ; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine ; Natl Acad Sci Armenia ; Sci Counc Japan ; World Acad Sci TWAS ; European Acad Sci ; Arts & Lett ; Acad Fine Arts Zagreb Croatia ; Croatian Acad Sci & Arts ; Acad Sci Moldova ; Montenegrin Acad Sci & Arts ; Georgian Acad Sci ; Acad Fine Arts & Design Bratislava ; Russian Acad Arts ; Turkish Acad Sci ; SGEM
dc.identifier.endpage565
dc.identifier.isbn9786197105308
dc.identifier.issn2367-5659
dc.identifier.startpage557
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11501/1499
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000357943500068
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.institutionauthorErenoğlu, Tülay
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherStef92 Technology Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts (SGEM 2014)
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEuropean Union
dc.subjectCapital Cities
dc.subjectArchitecture
dc.subjectUrban
dc.subjectKeynesian Theories
dc.titleCan a capital of eu represented as an architectural space? Soft capital vs. hard capital?
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
942.33 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu