The comparison of the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster set training configurations

dc.contributor.authorKale, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorBoyacı, Abdurrahman
dc.contributor.authorTolali, Ali Berkay
dc.contributor.authorYol, Yeliz
dc.contributor.authorAyaz, Ezgi
dc.contributor.authorTutar, Murat
dc.contributor.authorBaşoğlu, Umut Davut
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-17T13:07:48Z
dc.date.available2025-04-17T13:07:48Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFakülteler, Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi, Egzersiz ve Spor Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is no study about the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in different set configurations. This study aimed to compare the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster set training configurations. Methods: The study included 27 volunteer university students (age: 20.0 ± 1.2 year, height: 180.2 ± 6.9 cm, body weight: 76.0 ± 11.8 kg). Static foot plantar pressure (SFPP), countermovement jump (CMJ), and squat jump (SJ) were performed as pre-tests 8 min after the half-squat 1 repetition maximum (HS 1RM) test. After pre-tests, 12 reps of training were performed with 70% of the HS 1RM by varying the training configurations of 1 × 12 reps traditional set (TS) on the 4th day, 3 × 4 reps cluster set 1 (CS1) with 30 s rest on the 8th day, and 6 × 2 reps cluster set 2 (CS2) with 10 s rest on the 12th day. Post-tests were performed in the following of each configuration. Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used for the statistical comparison of the tests in four different time intervals. Results: There were no statistically significant SFPP differences in four different time periods, while statistically significant differences were found in the CMJ (p < 0.001) and SJ (p = 0.002). Pairwise comparisons showed that CMJ pre-test (CMJP RE ) had statistically significant differences with CMJT S, CMJCS1 and CMJCS2 . There were also differences between SJP RE and SJCS1, SJT S and SJCS2 for the SJ (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In conclusion, based on the results of the study, it is recommended to use any of the TS, CS1 and CS2 configurations to increase CMJ and to use the CS1 configuration to increase SJ as a performance enhancement at 8 min post-activity.
dc.description.sponsorshipIstanbul Nisantasi University
dc.identifier.doi10.22514/jomh.2025.038
dc.identifier.endpage76
dc.identifier.issn1875-6867
dc.identifier.issn1875-6859
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105002065689
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage66
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.22514/jomh.2025.038
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11501/2086
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001459503900008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorTutar, Murat
dc.institutionauthorid0009-0009-1726-7581
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMRE Press
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Men's Health
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCountermovement Jump
dc.subjectHalf-Squat
dc.subjectIntensity
dc.subjectPlantar Pressure
dc.subjectSquat Jump
dc.titleThe comparison of the effects of post-activity performance enhancement on foot plantar pressure and vertical jump in traditional set and cluster set training configurations
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Açıklama: