A comparative study on the microstructure, mechanical properties, wear and corrosion behaviors of SS 316 austenitic stainless steels manufactured by casting and WAAM technologies

dc.authoridKOCAMAN, Engin/0000-0001-5617-3064
dc.authoridGürol, Uğur/0000-0002-3205-7226
dc.authoridDilibal, Savas/0000-0003-4777-7995
dc.authorwosidKOCAMAN, Engin/A-6021-2016
dc.authorwosidGürol, Uğur/AAN-1097-2021
dc.authorwosidDilibal, Savas/Q-3748-2017
dc.contributor.authorGurol, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorKocaman, Engin
dc.contributor.authorDilibal, Savas
dc.contributor.authorKocak, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-13T20:17:55Z
dc.date.available2024-06-13T20:17:55Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Gedik Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractReplacing the traditional casting method with wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) to produce complex shaped parts will lead to using cost-effective technology even for challenging engineering applications depending on their geometry and number of the parts to be produced. This work performed a comparative study on the stainless steel 316 parts manufactured by WAAM and sand casting to reveal the microstructural, mechanical, wear, and corrosion behaviors. The WAAM components were manufactured using three different cooling dwell times and compared in terms of microstructures with the as-cast and heat-treated cast parts to reveal the properties of the WAAM parts. It was concluded that WAAM is a viable engineering alternative to the casting technology. Results showed that the WAAM and cast parts revealed similar microstructures, including delta ferrite and austenite phases, but the cast parts had a coarser grain and lower amount of delta ferrite due to slower cooling during the solidification. The yield and tensile strength of WAAM parts showed an increasing trend with the increase in dwell time, and on average, their yield strength was similar to 1.5 times higher than in cast parts due to the smaller grains and more elevated delta-ferrite content resulting from rapid cooling. Furthermore, the greatest wear resistance was obtained in the cast parts after solution annealing heat treatment followed by water quenching. In contrast the highest corrosion resistance was obtained from WAAM parts produced using a dwell time of 120 sec. In conclusion, WAAM technology can be an excellent alternative to casting technology for producing stainless-steel parts with optimized process parameters.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK) [5220023]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study has been supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK) under the scope of the University-Industry Cooperation Support Program with the project number of 5220023.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.10.005
dc.identifier.endpage227en_US
dc.identifier.issn1755-5817
dc.identifier.issn1878-0016
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85177779680en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage215en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.10.005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11501/1146
dc.identifier.volume47en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001112809200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofCirp Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectWire Arc Additive Manufacturingen_US
dc.subjectSand Castingen_US
dc.subject316l Stainless Steelen_US
dc.subjectWearen_US
dc.subjectCorrosionen_US
dc.subjectHeat-Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectWireen_US
dc.subjectFerriteen_US
dc.subjectPhaseen_US
dc.titleA comparative study on the microstructure, mechanical properties, wear and corrosion behaviors of SS 316 austenitic stainless steels manufactured by casting and WAAM technologiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar